Share |

Content about Pearson

November 5, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Roy Pearson lost his job as a District administrative law judge last week, only months after losing his $54 million lawsuit against Custom Cleaners over an allegedly lost pair of pants.

Pearson was asked to vacate his office last Tuesday after a six-person review panel voted against his appointment to a 10-year term. The panel said Pearson hadn’t demonstrated “appropriate judgment and judicial temperament” and was often “combative” with coworkers during his initial two-year term.

October 24, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Roy L. Pearson Jr., plaintiff in the $54 million lost-pants lawsuit that drove Washington, D.C.’s Custom Cleaners to the brink of bankruptcy, may soon lose his job as an administrative law judge.

A city commission voted against Pearson’s reappointment to the bench, according to sources speaking anonymously to the Washington Post. Pearson was up for appointment to a 10-year term at the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) after serving an initial two-year term.

September 24, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — So Jin and Soo Chung, defendants in the $54 million lost-pants lawsuit brought by Roy Pearson, have closed Custom Cleaners. The Chungs sold the plant due to the ongoing revenue losses and emotional toll resulting from the Pearson v. Chung lawsuit.

August 15, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — D.C. administrative judge Roy Pearson filed an appeal this morning to overturn the verdict in the ongoing $54 million lawsuit he brought against Custom Cleaners operators So Jin and Soo Chung over an allegedly lost pair of pants. Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled against Pearson in D.C. Superior Court in June, rejecting his claim and charging him the Chungs’ court costs.

July 18, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Judge Judith Bartnoff denied a request for reconsideration of her verdict from Roy Pearson, the plaintiff in the lost-pants lawsuit against Washington, D.C.’s Custom Cleaners. Bartnoff’s verdict refuted Pearson’s $54 million claim and also charged him the defendants’ legal fees.

July 9, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Roy Pearson, the District of Columbia judge who lost his $54 million lawsuit against the operators of Custom Cleaners last month, filed a motion last week seeking to reverse D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff’s verdict in the case.

Bartnoff ruled last month that Pearson’s case had no merit, awarding him none of the $54 million in compensation he sought for an allegedly missing pair of pants. She also charged the defendants’ court costs to the plaintiff.

June 25, 2007

WASHINGTON — D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff announced her verdict this morning in the multimillion-dollar lawsuit brought by Judge Roy Pearson against So Jin and Soo Chung, operators of Custom Cleaners in Washington, over a lost pair of pants.

June 20, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Judge Roy Pearson, the plaintiff in the $54 million lost-pants lawsuit against Custom Cleaners, broke down and cried during testimony in D.C. Superior Court last week, before reducing his claim to a comparatively reasonable $2.5 million.

“Never before in recorded history has a group of defendants engaged in such misleading and unfair business practices,” Pearson said in his opening statement. He then presented eight witnesses who related unhappy experiences with Custom Cleaners.

June 6, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Plaintiff Roy Pearson has reduced damages requested to $54 million in his lawsuit against So Jin and Soo Chung, operators of Custom Cleaners in the Fort Lincoln area of Washington. Pearson filed for $65 million in damages last month, almost two years after the Chungs allegedly lost a single pair of his pants.

May 3, 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Washington, D.C., judge is suing his local drycleaner for an incredible $65 million over a lost pair of pants.

Plaintiff Roy Pearson filed papers last week against the operators of Custom Cleaners, a three-store operation in the Fort Lincoln neighborhood of Washington. The cleaners allegedly lost a favorite pair of pants he wished to wear on his first day on the bench, resulting in mental duress.